Fix issue & comment history bugs (#29525)

* Follow #17746: `HasIssueContentHistory` should use expr builder to
make sure zero value (0) be respected.
* Add "doer" check to make sure `canSoftDeleteContentHistory` only be
called by sign-in users.

models/issues/content_history.go

@@ -172,13 +172,9 @@ func FetchIssueContentHistoryList(dbCtx context.Context, issueID, commentID int6
 
 // HasIssueContentHistory check if a ContentHistory entry exists
 func HasIssueContentHistory(dbCtx context.Context, issueID, commentID int64) (bool, error) {
-	exists, err := db.GetEngine(dbCtx).Cols("id").Exist(&ContentHistory{
+	exists, err := db.GetEngine(dbCtx).Where(builder.Eq{"issue_id": issueID, "comment_id": commentID}).Exist(&ContentHistory{})
-		IssueID:   issueID,
-		CommentID: commentID,
-	})
 	if err != nil {
-		log.Error("can not fetch issue content history. err=%v", err)
+		return false, fmt.Errorf("can not check issue content history. err: %w", err)
-		return false, err
 	}
 	return exists, err
 }

models/issues/content_history_test.go

@@ -78,3 +78,22 @@ func TestContentHistory(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.EqualValues(t, 7, list2[1].HistoryID)
 	assert.EqualValues(t, 4, list2[2].HistoryID)
 }
+
+func TestHasIssueContentHistoryForCommentOnly(t *testing.T) {
+	assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
+
+	_ = db.TruncateBeans(db.DefaultContext, &issues_model.ContentHistory{})
+
+	hasHistory1, _ := issues_model.HasIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 10, 0)
+	assert.False(t, hasHistory1)
+	hasHistory2, _ := issues_model.HasIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 10, 100)
+	assert.False(t, hasHistory2)
+
+	_ = issues_model.SaveIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 1, 10, 100, timeutil.TimeStampNow(), "c-a", true)
+	_ = issues_model.SaveIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 1, 10, 100, timeutil.TimeStampNow().Add(5), "c-b", false)
+
+	hasHistory1, _ = issues_model.HasIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 10, 0)
+	assert.False(t, hasHistory1)
+	hasHistory2, _ = issues_model.HasIssueContentHistory(db.DefaultContext, 10, 100)
+	assert.True(t, hasHistory2)
+}

routers/web/repo/issue_content_history.go

@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ func canSoftDeleteContentHistory(ctx *context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue
 	// CanWrite means the doer can manage the issue/PR list
 	if ctx.Repo.IsOwner() || ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) {
 		canSoftDelete = true
-	} else {
+	} else if ctx.Doer != nil {
 		// for read-only users, they could still post issues or comments,
 		// they should be able to delete the history related to their own issue/comment, a case is:
 		// 1. the user posts some sensitive data
@@ -186,6 +186,10 @@ func SoftDeleteContentHistory(ctx *context.Context) {
 	if ctx.Written() {
 		return
 	}
+	if ctx.Doer == nil {
+		ctx.NotFound("Require SignIn", nil)
+		return
+	}
 
 	commentID := ctx.FormInt64("comment_id")
 	historyID := ctx.FormInt64("history_id")